You might have seen those “bucket list” movies where ageing stars team up to tick off lifelong dreams and get into a bit of mischief along the way. You know the type – pleasant, sentimental, and fairly predictable.
Now we come to Land Ho!, which shares a similar idea trying to reclaim a sense of youth. But the actors here are hardly household names, and nothing they do is especially extravagant or wild. It’s simply two former brothers-in-law vacationing in Iceland. When I first started watching it, I thought it was a travel documentary. The realism, the small details in their behaviour, and the improvisational feel make it hard to tell where performance begins and ends. They visit Reykjavík nightclubs, soak in thermal baths, explore rugged campsites – and yes, they even share a puff of weed.
Principal photography took just 16 days in Iceland. Naturally, the cinematography is stunning – it is Iceland, after all. You could almost just point and shoot. It was shot on two Red One cameras to better capture natural reactions, edited in six weeks, and remarkably, only one year and three days passed between its conception and its premiere at Sundance.
As the film unfolds, you become quietly immersed in their “quest” – though what that quest is exactly remains unclear. That’s part of the charm. There’s no grand objective, no dramatic destination. It’s simply about living and companionship.
What I appreciated most was the contrast between the two men: one, a loud, bawdy, free-spending American surgeon; the other, a quieter and more reserved Australian. But that simplification shouldn’t suggest they are stereotypes. Far from it. This is a character-rich story. As critic Glenn Kenny wrote in his review for RogerEbert.com, there’s “character driven,” and then there’s “CHARACTER driven.” That sums it up.
The filmmakers don’t force us to either love or dislike these men. They have flaws, irritations, warmth, and vulnerability – just like anyone. They don’t behave as if they are trying to impress anyone. Their chemistry feels genuine, and the message they convey is subtle but touching. This is a refreshingly unsuperficial film.
One of the most intriguing turns in the story comes when the men meet two young, independent women during their travels. The encounter makes the older men playful and hopeful. You feel for the women too, wondering how they will respond to this unexpected attention. It’s a delicate dynamic, handled with restraint and charm. The interactions are nuanced and gently comic, reflecting the spirit of the entire film. As Manohla Dargis of The New York Times observed, the film offers a portrait of men who are gloriously alive and who just happen to be old.
The movie wasn’t especially well received by general audiences, earning a modest 6.0 on IMDb and 54% on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics, however, were far more positive, with 82% on Rotten Tomatoes and a strong 3.5 out of 4 in the Roger Ebert review below. I fall firmly in the critics’ camp on this one. Is it a must-see masterpiece? No, not at all. But it is a refreshing and quietly funny adventure-comedy for mature audiences – and I got a real kick out of it.
The film won the John Cassavetes Award for Best Feature under $500,000 at the 2015 Independent Spirit Awards.
Thanks for reading.
References:
1. Land Ho! – Roger Ebert
2. Land Ho! – IMDB
3. Land Ho! – Wikipedia





















