Who Killed JFK? The Kennedy Assassination – Beyond Conspiracy

conspiracyI got hooked, lined and sinkered into the the whole conspiracy theory camp after seeing Oliver Stone’s JFK the movie. It aligned with my world view and the whole ‘masters of war’ rhetoric.
Thankfully, I did a bit of my own research and found that this movie was actually as biased and misleading as it accused others of being like the US Government.

I’m not insinuating there wasn’t some form of cover up, but what I am purporting is that JFK the movie has done more harm in hindering people from understanding what really happened than the suppression of information has by the US Government. A movie leaves a powerful imprint on the minds of viewers yet a lot of what is detailed in that movie are clearly great miss-truths. I feel quite embarrassed that I let myself fall for Stone’s conspiracy bullshit for so long.

Probably the best documentary I found which explains just how far fetched Stone’s version of the events  is ‘Peter Jennings Reporting: The Kennedy Assassination – Beyond Conspiracy‘. It was originally broadcast in the UK on 23 November, 2003 on the BBC. The full video can be viewed at the end of this article.
I found the documentary so informative I felt compelled to write excerpts in an attempt to internalize the information. Most of what is written below is verbatim, however some of it is partially redacted to be more reader-friendly.

The Single Bullet theory

For most Americans, the idea of a lone assassin could kill the president, a man so widely revered – was simply too much to bear. For such a monstrous act, there must be a monstrous plot. It had to be a conspiracy. Yet the Single Bullet theory of the second shot which hits both men in a perfect trajectory from the book depository (as clearly seen on the zapruda film – frame 223) is not a theory at all. It is a fact.  The fanciful Magic Bullet theory alluding to more than one gunman, hence a conspiracy is simply misleading and in a word – wrong. The bullet did not hang in air or zig zag. It went straight through. Both Kennedy and Connelly reacted at exactly the same time. In the Stone film it has Connelly sitting directly in front of the President rather than where he actually was 6 inches in board and turned sharply to his right after hearing the first shot. The Governor was also seated 3 inches lower than the President. When the men are seen in their correct positions it becomes clear. No magic about this bullet. The bullet found in a stretcher wasn’t in pristine condition as the Stone film states, but it was flat. It is also conclusively the same bullet fired from the LHO’s rifle and not planted by Jack Ruby as shown in the Stone film.

Lee Harvey Oswald

Over the last 50 years it’s as though the American people have lost almost all idea of who Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was; his history, background and motives. His brother who knew him best, stated that if he had the facts that LHO was innocent he would be ‘out there’ shouting for his innocence. It’s his conviction that no one but Lee was involved. He further states, ‘People need to look at what transpired before that, everything. You have go all the way from childhood and all the way up, especially that last year of his life to understand what transpired in his life.’

It is uncanny the amount of people that knew Lee who say that he fantasized about who he was, and that nobody was paying attention that he was important. He spent the latter half of his life trying to be a revolutionary and make his mark on the world. In April 1963 he was ready to be a political assassin by killing Edwin Walker. He photographed Walker’s home and had a an escape route. He even left his wife instructions about what to do in case he didn’t return. This was the Rosetta Stone of the Kennedy assassination. Oswald had previously reached the grade of sharp shooter in the marines. He was able to fire rapidly and accurately at a target 200 yards away.
After he was rejected by the Cuban and Russian embassies in Mexico he  had no place to turn. He definitely wasn’t changing the world as he had envisaged. Then the opportunity came. He ventured to the book depository building, his workplace with a long object wrapped in brown paper telling another worker, ‘it was curtain rods’. Later that day he would finally be somebody.

Jack Ruby

First words out of Jack Ruby’s mouth to a friend were, ‘I am a hero’. Like LHO he wanted to be important. Gangsters didn’t want anything to do with Jack. His temper was his trademark. Because Jack dined Police at his establishment, he could come and go at Police headquarters. Just hours after the JFK assassination, Jack closed his club. He was hysterical. He said he would shoot the son of a bitch if he gets a chance. If Jack Ruby knew something, he would let the whole world know. Over the weekend he was visibly upset, mumbling, not making sense. In his distorted mind, he did the right thing – This man killed his president. In less than 48 hours the president had been murdered and his assassin silenced. The floodgate on conspiracy were wide open.The people that knew Ruby didn’t think he was part of a conspiracy, but millions of Americans did.

Jim Garrison and  the JFK The Movie

No book or TV program has done more to promote conspiracy theory than the JFK movie.

‘The most powerful historians of the 20th Century are filmmakers. It is those images that we remember…Most Americans know of the Kennedy Assassination through Oliver Stone’s mind…’.  Robert Goldberg, Enemies Within

The film makes a hero out of Jim Garrison. Yet it is purported by many who knew him that he was unethical and cruel and obsessed with proving a conspiracy regardless of the evidence. When a public official like Garrison says something, people assume he knows what he is talking about.  Garrison promoted himself as brave enough as facing a Government bent on burying the facts on what really happened. He said he was discovering a web of conspiracy, but in the end he put just one man on trial. But Garrison never explained why Shaw would want to kill the President. Garrison tried to put Shaw in the same apartment with LHO and David Ferrie, but the only witness Perry Russo stated at the lie detector test to Ed O’donnell, ‘I don’t know’ and later stated Shaw wasn’t there which incensed Garrison who was riding on his testimony and went into a rage. It took just 54 minutes for the jury to decide that Shaw was innocent.

As Shaw’s defense attorney stated, ‘It is  possible that Jim Garrison’s charge was one of the greatest injustices of the legal system of the US’.  Yet Oliver Stone’s film resurrected him as a hero. In reality the film is a package of unfathomable lies. A blending of real and fictional video emerged together which made audiences unable to tell the difference.  But the film dispute s many facts. It purports THE GUY couldn’t do the shooting. NOBODY COULD.

FACT. The time of the fatal shot, LHO was just 88 yards away. For a former marine sharp shooter the shot was well within his capability. He was a highly competent marksman. He scored 48 out of 50 (or better) at 200 yards on multiple days. The Stone film states there being 6 seconds to get the shots off. But as per the Zapruda film 3 shots were fired in 8.3 seconds which for Oswald was plenty of time.

‘Back and to the left’, ‘Back and to the left’  is another Stone argument that there was another gunman, but this in no way indicates where a bullet came from. The entry wound is definitive of which direction the bullet came from and in this case it came from the back. The autopsy photos and xrays show the cratered wound on the back on Kennedy’s skull.

Most people believed everything in the movie and that is sad. It has put certain myths into the American bloodstream that abide to this day.

At the end of the day you just have to say, despite how much you want a conspiracy, there just is NO evidence. People want to believe that things are just not that random and things are just not that chaotic. Something larger and bigger was at stake here. How could someone as inconsequential as Oswald kill someone like the President?

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Movies and TV, politics

The Lego Movie. Be Wary of the Hype

the lego movieI saw it The Lego Movie my son yesterday. I cannot understand 96% on Rotten Tomatoes. The beginning and end was interesting, but everything in between was well…very lego-ish. I felt like I was sitting in a boardroom watching a long lego promo.  I was interested in seeing a movie, a film, a story. I wasn’t interested having products and the Lego brand shoved down my throat.

To quote an astute IMD member, ‘This film tries to manufacture emotional depth without actually having any – kind of an example of the main problem, which is that just by wishing they made a movie with real meaning it could be so. Toy Story and so many other great animated movies actually HAVE emotional depth and real feeling, and the contrast highlights that this facsimile is using pure manipulation. And kids know the difference‘ – my son also left shaking his head at the end and wondering what had gone wrong and why it wasn’t like ‘Frozen‘.

Great advertisement for Lego. That’s what I got from it, more than any other message.  It hits on the nostalgia factor or the independent master builder message – but what is its end purpose? It’s just clever marketing. It isn’t in the same ballpark as the classic Toy Story 3.

6/10

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Movies and TV

Is Josh Turner a Musical Prodigy?

You guys should listen to this kid.  I subscribed to his youtube channel yesterday. He is amazing.

This is take 2 of “Wagon Wheel” a song originally sketched by Bob Dylan and later completed by Ketch Secor of Old Crow Medicine Show.

See this cover of Paul Simon’s Graceland.

He plays with his Dad, different friends, and solo

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Music

Inside Llewyn Davis – The Coen Brothers

Inside Llewyn Davis Ulysses Cat


Inside Llewyn Davis is about a folk singer trying, but not very successfully to make it ‘big’ in the early 1960s Greenwich Village. Llewyn is a lost man trapped inside a beastly world where its unremittingly bad karma pounds down hard on him. He is a loser who keeps on losing.  We toil with Llewyn;  just hoping he has a warm coat and that someone will answer the doorbell when he rings.

Coen Bros


Co-director, Ethan Coen recently said, “It’s more interesting for me as an audience member to see a movie about a loser”. Joel Coen added, “We gave him a lot of crosses to bear.”

We understand Llewyn not so much based on what he says but by the visual cues, his songs, and character traits. Cars whooshing by; the ambient crunch of snow as he ploughs on shuddering and shivering in the howling, freezing wind.

‘This is a brilliant anti-Oscar film with an unsympathetic hero, set against a washed-out New York, a historical time period with no flash or cash or swagger….The qualities that made it so memorable and affecting have counted against it; the films that are nominated reveal what Inside Llewyn Davis is not.‘
– Tim Teeman The Daily Beast. Read more here.

Every meeting in the film; with friends, family, and strangers is like a song from his solo album – Inside LLewyn Davis. They seem to be snippets/moments as a product or reaction of their time like songs are to a folk album. The musical trio performing Please Mr Kennedy alludes to this. The Coen Brothers have transported us to a hub of musical history, an almost visceral musical landscape from the point of view of a largely unknown and unsuccessful musical artist.

“If it was never new, and it never gets old, then it’s a folk song.”

The fight scene shown as the second scene of the movie is shown again to us (with slight editing changes) in its correct place as the penultimate scene before Llewyn says “Au revoir” which means  ‘to see again’ or ‘until we meet again’. The ending seems to suggest the record is on a loop or we have turned the record over and placed the needle down again only this time, we have the added knowledge of having already listened to the songs. We have grown to the know the artist. The second listen is illuminated by that knowledge and our watching/listening experience changes (evidence that the same scene is shown with slight alterations).
This record analogy, playing it over again, isn’t exactly conventional storytelling- in fact it may not even be storytelling. But this is the Coen brothers, and they ain’t interested in convention.

And finally … THE CATS!

Llewyn calls Columbia to inform Goldstien that he has his cat, the secretary says:

“Tell him, ‘Llewyn is THE cat”.

The popular interpretation regarding the cat is it represents the meandering lost Llewyn Davis and the quote above ‘Llewyn is the cat’ reinforces this. Also the cat’s name is Ulysses, a clear reference to the Odyssey and their previous film Oh Brother, Where Art Thou. Llewyn even looks inquisitively at a movie poster ‘Homeward Bound’, which is curiously out of place since it was released in 1963. But it is probably deliberate because by 1963 Dylan had taken the folk movement to a place no one had foreseen. Was this Llewyn glimpsing into the future and later seeing it with his very own eyes at the Gaslight. He of course is too consumed by his own preoccupations and aloofness to pay it any mind.

Inside Llewyn Davis_cat


The sharper and much more confronting dual meaning of the cats is that they correspond to the two babies he intent on having aborted. Llewyn ended up with these two cats without any intention of keeping them, just like the two babies. One cat got away (like his first baby that is now 2 years old) and the other got wounded and probably killed by his car (analogous to his second baby which we presume was aborted). The wounding of the second cat occurs just after he passes the highway exit to the city where his first child resides. This isn’t a coincidence.

Related Articles/Links:
1. When I Met The Coen Brothers And a Secret Behind the Filming of Inside Llewyn Davis
2. An interesting interview – Academy Conversations: “Inside Llewyn Davis”:

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Movies and TV, Music

Cold Showers Help Burn Fat

shower

ABC News Australia –  ‘Ten minutes of shivering can provide the same results as an hour of moderate exercise, research shows’.

See full article


Related Articles / Links:
1. Cold Shower Weight Loss – Is it Good or Bad
2. Cold Showers
3. 7 Reasons to Take Cold Showers and 1 That Really Matters
4. Ten Health Benefits of Cold Showers

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Health

Fall 24 miles to Earth with Felix Baumgartner in New Space-Jump Video

This video is Felix Baumgartner plummeting at death defying speed from the stratosphere.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Movies and TV, Sport and Adventure

Chrysler and Bob Dylan Super Bowl Commercial 2014

Ultimate Classic Rock: ‘We all knew that Bob Dylan‘s music would appear in two Super Bowl commercials this year, but what we didn’t know was how strongly — and clearly — he would verbally testify on behalf of the American auto industry in one of them‘. See full article here.

Bill Maher tweeted: ‘First P S Hoffman dies, then the worst super bowl ever, then Dylan does a car commercial?? Not a good day for America.‘

Various Expecting Rain (ER) Discussion reactions:

‘Dylan looks horrible in that ad in the truest sense of the word. Like he’s dead and has been injected with formaldehyde. When he lip-syncs it looks like the movement of his lips has been computer-generated (badly) to give the impression he’s not only dead, but whoever made the ad couldn’t be bothered pretending otherwise. I bet most kids who had the misfortune to see that ad had nightmares about it last night; hell, I bet I have nightmares about it. Mostly, the ad brought to mind some of the characters I remember from video games – maybe a cheap hood playing pool in some downtown dive in Grand Theft Auto, or a zombie in Resident Evil that has shuffled into the drug store where the good guys are hiding. Either way, it seemed like the only sensible reaction was to load up some ammo and destroy the thing, before it destroys us.’

‘I sat front row at a Bob show during the summer. He was not far from me. He did not look like that at all. He looked great.’

‘The thing that saddens me about this is not the false idea of this man personally ‘selling-out’ which just isn’t the case at all, but the freakish, Photoshopped image of the man at the pool table at the end of the video, presented as the archetypical plastic, face-lift man of Hollywood carnival. Quite simply – this is not the same man I saw and heard at the Albert Hall last year, but instead an airbrushed puppet, a spooky marionette, complete with overdubbed voice and forced to speak inane lines like “Is there anything more American than America?” (probably something Dylan wouldn’t wish to say if you pointed a gun at his head and demanded he utter it on pain of death), and it makes me sad to see this kind of stuff.
On stage, he was a magician with me and the whole audience as well. I see none of that spirit here.’

‘Maybe the ghoulish / death pallor look was supposed to serve as a comment on the state of American Industry.  If so, I’ve got to wonder how much was accomplished for the legions of stunned viewers spilling their Super Bowl nachos and refried beans down the front of their shirts and then 5 minutes later forgetting completely about it.

Related Articles / Links:
1. Watch 10 Incredible Clips From The Career of the Late, Great Philip Seymour Hoffman
2. Bob Dylan’s Genius
3. Is Chrysler America’s Company?? Their Super Bowl Ad Says They Are
4. Rolling Stone: The spot was far from Dylan’s first venture into advertising

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Movies and TV, Music

There is Now a Different Kind of Stalker on the Prowl. Cyberstalker

cyberstalkerAt night after work I drift into my usual routine of searching girls on the Net. I sit in my usual chair and look into the glazy maze of lights on the computer screen, my hand wrapped around one of the evening’s many beers.

Lives cross and uncross and even merge in this singles Internet world. I begin to look back at a not-so-distant time when the adventures of life were as fresh as the next morning’s bread. I was looking forward to when my next ‘real’ life could begin.

I don’t need any nudging to find love on the Internet. But I know that the leaning back, the straining forward, the gibberish and gobbledegook will stop after a few hours when irritability turns to sleepiness and drink-affected sleep beckons. But perhaps it won’t be like that tonight. I might fall asleep content, even feeling a little bit merry about a star on the horizon. Maybe this will be one of those nights I look back on in years to come. So I sit in silence, an almost childlike fascination written on my face. Then as I stretch my head I notice a food stain on my jumper from my previous evening’s meal and laugh it off. I hear the heavens draining and I turn to my window, suddenly feeling cold.

The MSN blip trumpets me back to life with the realisation that someone else is there.

My feeling of coldness ends as abruptly as it came. I raise my eyes to the screen and stare at a young girl. All of twenty-two years of age, she has short cropped black hair, white skin and large dark brown eyes. She smiles at me, her scarlet lips showing her white even teeth. The sort of girl you dream of bringing home to meet Mum. Even though I am thirty years old, I think Mum would be awfully proud. Not of me, mind you, but this sweet-hearted, good-natured girl called Bindi.

This is my world.

This world’s function really is to be the repository for emotions that I don’t know what to do with. It will also bring people alive who can become the recipients of these feelings. But I don’t know that now.

Bindi takes a lot of getting to know. There are some girls who take about two hours of consistent chatting to drop the question, “Hey would you like to run into one another one day?” I got that line from a girl who actually asked me out on a date, so I won’t forget those words too quickly. However, Bindi, who is twenty-two going on fifty-two, scoots around the question like a savvy politician.

 “I want to chat more before meeting you. It took me three years to feel comfortable enough to open up to my girlfriend and yet you and I have only been chatting for a week.”

“Oh no!” I thought. This was the bombshell that blasted any hope of meeting this girl within the football season.

But the story of Bindi and me doesn’t end there.

The story goes much deeper. I have fared well from making mistakes and fortunately I am still around to tell you this. We can make carefree assumptions about who we think people are and what makes them tick, all the while ignorant of their history. In the case of Belinda, for instance, she was careful because she had a stalker.


| Session Start: Saturday, 1 January 2005                           

| Participants:                                                     

|    Matthew (learners realm)                            

|    Bindi (in need of intellectuals)

[08:51:56 PM] Bindi: The reason why I’m so hesitant to meet people and why I don’t give out much information about Me? I chatted to someone online for a while … Who I never saw a picture of … and he decided he was going to visit me at work … not that I knew he was there … but he took great delight in ‘stalking’ me.

[08:52:10 PM] Matthew: Oh shit!

[08:52:19 PM] Matthew: How did you know?

[08:52:30 PM] Bindi: Because he would send me sms’s and tell me online. Exactly what I was wearing at work that day, who I was working with.

[08:52:51 PM] Bindi: He knew their names and what time I was working.

Posted in Reading, Reflections

Interesting Reactions to the ‘The Oscars Has Lost all Respectability’ Post

imd

I forwarded my previous post ‘The Oscars has lost all ounce of respectability as a serious contest‘ to all the relevant movie discussion boards on Internet Movie Database. I was curious to know what the opinions of others were about my views and the ‘The Oscar Nominations’ .  The post has received at least 2 pages of opinions on each board and still growing. Below are some excerpts from some replies received on the threads. I have tried to provide a good snapshot encapsulating the broad spectrum of opinions about my post :

‘I agree – Oscars were sometimes awarded to the wrong people or film. This goes way back and here are some more examples yet I keep watching the overlong awards show just about every year. If Cate Blanchett doesn’t win the Oscar for Blue Jasmine, I’ll probably stop watching it myself.
Citizen Kane lost to How Green Was My Valley
Some Like it Hot lost to Ben-Hur
Bonnie & Clyde and The Graduate both lost out to In the Heat of the Night
Saving Private Ryan lost to Shakespeare in Love
Brokeback Mountain lost to Crash
Goodfellas lost to Dances with Wolves
Richard Burton, Montgomery Clift, Cary Grant, Peter O’Toole, and Orson Welles (besides screenplay) never won an Oscar.
Greta Garbo, Gena Rowlands, Deborah Kerr, Barbara Stanwyck, and Glenn Close never won an Oscar.
Alfred Hitchcock was nominated as Best Director five times by the Academy – total wins – zero! ‘ – Rubymar1

‘I believe anyone who is seriously into film should also know that the mere mention of the Coen Bros should turn just as many heads as an Oscar nom would do. The Coen Bros are a better staple for quality than most Oscar wins, I think.’  – anova_standard

‘…and I haven’t bothered to watch them for that long. I’d rather watch paint dry than watch that self-congratulatory, back-patting, overhyped, meaningless bullsh*t. I always find something better to do. Like sleep.’ –  FeloniousMunk

‘Both of those two first mentioned films were absolute rubbish. Thank Christ the Academy agreed.’ – equalthree

‘The only sane response to this is to ask “what ounce of respectability?” The Oscars are publicity intended to promote whatever films the film industry sees fit to promote during “Oscar season”. The illusion of “quality” has always been more important than actual quality; and in the end, it is always about selling tickets. ‘ – nystulc

‘….please don’t crap on Wolf of Wall Street. That was a fantastic movie and I definitely am excited for it’s Best Picture nomination. It shows that there are still some voters that like to have fun at the movies and don’t think that movies need to be dark, brooding, and pretentious for them to be considered “art.” ‘ – magicman205

‘That’s 15 very strong films (16 including Lleweyn Davis). This is the strongest year in recent memory, so to say they “lost all respect” because they left this out is a really dramatic overstatement.’ – TimViper1

“The Wolf of Wall Street” isn’t a patch on “Goodfellas”, “Raging Bull”, or “Taxi Driver” true. But did any of those films ever win an Oscar? “Taxi Driver” lost out to “Rocky”, a film by an actor turned first-time screenwriter Sly Stallone. “Raging Bull” lost to “Ordinary People”, a film by actor turned first-time director Robert Redford…..” – lazarillo

“EVERY year someone posts the exact same thread title. It’s now your year to bitch and moan, but others have been saying that Oscars have lost respectability for years.” – MuchToBeGratefulFor

‘That said, the Oscars are indeed what the late historian Daniel J. Boorstin labeled a “pseudo-event.” (Boorstin wasn’t referring to the Oscars, but they meet his definition, as do such pseudo-events as presidential debates, which he referred to specifically. See Boorstin’s 1962 book The Image: Or What Happened to the American Dream.)
But, hey, they’re something to talk about, which is kind of the point …’ – joekiddlouischama

‘There’s no shame in David O. Russell paying homage to Scorsese for American Hustle. That wasn’t what made the film weak in my mind at all — hell, dozens of filmmakers ranging from the truly great like Paul Thomas Anderson do it all the time. And Scorsese himself learned much of his now “trademark” film techniques from other guys like Cassavettes, Kenneth Anger, and Jean-Luc Godard………

……The statement you made “As usual, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are a bit late giving Scorsese all the Oscar nods he should have got in the past” is mis-leading, because Scorsese has ALWAYS got Oscar nods. Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellas…I mean, these were nominated for the top awards all the time, so it’s no different today than it was in the 70’s. If he was winning all the time (like, with not just Departed, but also Wolf (which doesn’t stand a chance), Aviator, Hugo, etc), then your argument would have some merit. – gilbert_gumphrey

‘Like it or not, Academy members are industry professionals, and their (collective and individual) opinions remain very valid.

And people who claim it’s ‘all political’ need to wake up. The AMPAS is made up of individual members who vote based on their own opinion. When Meryl Streep or Vilmos Zsigmond or Robert Towne or whoever sit down to consider their opinions on what to vote for, I can assure you the predominant thought running through their mind is much more likely to be ‘which of these do I feel is the most deserving’, as opposed to ‘which of these best fits in with the Academy’s political agenda for this year?’

Since the beginning of time, people have used the old ‘political’ excuse to justify why their own personal favourites fail to receive recognition they feel it deserves. The Dark Knight misses out? Well, the Academy is just too political these days. What was the Academy’s specific ‘political’ objection to the Dark Knight? They don’t like action films. Well maybe that’s because the Academy isn’t made up of 20-something comic book fans’ –  Robbmonster

‘….if Hollywood was a high school the Oscars would be the student counsel elections. oh who to nominate this year? hmmmm lets nomimate the most popular kids in school: George Clooney, brad pitt, Julia roberts and hot flavors of the month like Bradley cooper, Jennifer Laurence, and the always repugnant Jonah hill.’ –  movieman82

“Unfortunately, the critical worth, artistic vision, cultural influence, and innovative qualities of many films are not given the same voting weight. Especially since the 1980s, moneymaking “formula-made” blockbusters with glossy production values have often been crowd-pleasing titans (and Best Picture winners), but they haven’t necessarily been great films with depth or critical acclaim by any measure.”
– Tim Dirks, editor of AMC’s filmsite.org – nefron_aveline

Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Movies and TV

‘The Oscars’ Has Lost all Ounce of Respectability as a Serious Award Contest

oscar1

‘Inside Llewyn Davis’ and ‘Blue Jasmine’ (best actress aside) have been shunned from the principal Oscar award categories. How was ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’  snubbed for Best Picture, Best Actor,  and Screenplay nominations?  Likewise ‘Blue Jasmine’ for Best director and Best picture? What movie award ceremony can put a movie like ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ ahead of ‘Inside Llewyn Davis‘ and ‘Blue Jasmine’. I tell you one- The Oscars.  See all nominations here.

Scorsese’s Wolf of Wall Street isn’t a patch on his  90’s greats Goodfellas or Casino, yet here it still gets Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor nods. Lets look at some statistics shall we? Scorsese’s ‘Wolf’ has just a 76% score by the film critics at Rotten Tomatoes and 81% of audience liked it, yet Blue Jasmine received 91% score by critics and 82% of the audiences liked it. ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’ 94% by the critics and 77% of audiences liked it. If you averaged out these scores ‘Jasmine’ and ‘Llewyn’ are markedly better received movies than the ‘Wolf’.  What is probably most striking is how the ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ receives a ginormous 8.7/10 popularity on IMDB (a top 250 movie of all time) the same  population who fueled Christopher Nolen’s Batman into the greatest movies of all time. So why all the love for Scorsese? See the folk on ‘the Wolf’s’ forum on IMD. They are the epicenter of Hollywood’s focus on payday.
As usual, the  Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are a bit late  giving Scorsese  all the Oscar awards he was rightfully due .

This years Oscars also ignored the following actors:

Oscar Isaac  ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’,
Joaquin Phoenix  ‘Her’ , and
Tom Hanks for Captain Philips.

Any tinge of respectability I once had for the Oscars and its selection process has all but faded away into a mainstream oblivion of tabloid hysteria and Hollywood stardom. American Hustle received a staggering 10 nominations. You would think we had a classic movie on our hands. In a previous post I wrote about ‘American Hustle’:

‘Anyone even remotely familiar with Scorsese cannot deny that David Russell has lent heavily from Scorsese’s quintessential best movies to make American Hustle . The narratives, the music and editing, in particular the first half of the movie all point toward a seeming homage to Scorsese’s 90′s work, specifically Casino. Even De Niro makes a key entrance in a role so reminiscent of Casino wearing the same ginormous glasses Scorsese left us with in the final scene.‘

I’ll be tuning into other award ceremonies from now on for a bit more respectability about celebrating the art of film-making, perhaps like the Cannes Film Festival.

The Coen Brothers cinematic gem ‘Barton Fink‘ which highlights the hellish truth about Hollywood is now up in bright lights for everyone to see and probably has been since Citizen Kane was dismissed by the Oscars in 1941 because of its controversy surrounding its obvious connections with media tycoon Randolph Hearst .  Everything is political and Hollywood epitomizes it.

Posted in Movies and TV

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 783 other subscribers

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨