I am frankly very surprised by the negativity surrounding this movie. My partner and I are big fans of the first movie and we went into this with high expectations, but it didn’t disappoint in the slightest. The storyline carried some punch and the ‘Blind’ lighthouse scenes and their pet shark ‘Doby’ had us in stitches.
Probably like Anchorman 1 it will get better with each viewing. I’m glad this has gone under the radar, because just like the 1st movie and a good red wine it will grow old gracefully.
I came across ‘The Nothing Song’ song some years ago when I watched the final scene in the movie Vanilla Sky. Cameron Crowe, the director of Vanilla Sky has such a great taste in music as seen by the song selections in his movies. He wrote and directed a very underappreciated movie called Almost Famous which is semi-autobiographical as Crowe himself was a teenage writer for Rolling Stone.
Interestingly, he wrote the liner notes on Bob Dylan’s legendary bootleg release Biograph. Bob Dylan songs and references feature heavily in his movies including the replication of Bob Dylan’s Freewheelin’ album cover in Vanilla Sky as seen in this image.
Good on Cameron Crowe for selecting this little known Icelandic music phenomenon to bring home his movie. The last 15 minutes of Vanilla Sky always moves me, mainly because of how effectively The Nothing Song captures the final lucid-dreaming epiphany of the protagonist.
This is music making at its finest. Njósnavélin (Nothing Song) sounds otherworldly and truly transcendental. I never get tired of it.
Last night I saw this gorgeous movie called Smiles of a Summer Night. This Ingmar Bergman period piece comedy runs rampant with extremely clever and witty dialogue. It’s so unashamedly cheeky! On the surface, it’s seemingly a light-hearted humorous romp but it eventually seeps into very dark places and with surprising potency. We laugh at the histrionics of it, but Bergman keeps us ever present of the dark nature residing within ourselves.
The film’s plot—which involves switching partners on a summer night—has been adapted many times, arguably most notably as Woody Allen’s film A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy (1982).
I admire how Bergman delves so delicately into the emotional intelligence and sexuality of women in this movie. Men do not come off so well in Bergman’s charming sex comedy. The women on the other hand are stronger, more self-reflective, capable of pandering to the male ego and to direct their affections elsewhere when the need arises. Retribution and humiliation galore in this film.
The key themes of the film – ‘Love’ and ‘Youth’ are wonderfully expounded in the dialogue below. It’s about how Love is almost a thing confined to the past; an experience associated with innocence, virginity and youth and the older one gets, the pursuit of Love ( a ‘young lover’s’ ideal) only brings about desperation, frustration and ultimately despair.
PETRA: Why have I never been a young lover? Can you tell me that?
FRID: There are only a very few young lovers on this earth. Yes, one can almost count them. Love has smitten them both as a gift and as a punishment. We invoke love, call out for it, beg for it, cry for it, try to imitate it, think that we have it, lie about it.
PETRA: But we don’t have it.
FRID: No, my sugar plum. The love of lovers is denied to us. We don’t have the gift.
PETRA: Nor the punishment.
See the full transcript here, which explains the 3 smiles of the summer night.
Ingmar Bergman never ceases to amaze me. I have to see it again to ascertain if it is one of my favourite Bergman films. There is just so much great competition, such as Winter Light, Wild Strawberries and Persona to name but a few. I’d like to know where this film stands amongst your favourite Bergman movies.
Once you have seen the film you may want to check out the always entertaining and highly informative Breaking Down Bergman series film review of ‘Smiles of a Summer Night’.
Dylan is using his voice in Pay in Blood to project a dialogue between four distinct protagonists in this protest song. The first half entails a fierce exchange between ‘slave’ and ‘slaveowner’ but then the song transfigures into a comparably merciless showdown between ‘Soldier’ and ‘Politician’. I’ve always considered it in some sense Dylan’s omniscient update of his own early period piece -‘Masters of War’.
I was translating Pay in Blood into Spanish for a friend when I realised a clear division between the first four lines of the verse and the subsequent four. Then it became apparent to me which characters he was representing in each 4 line stanza. Also, his voice changes markedly and the instrumentals shift to reflect the alteration. Read more ›
Back in 2003, I was going through a really bad patch. My marriage and career was failing, my father had been diagnosed with terminal cancer and my previous work boss and good friend died of a sudden heart attack. I was in more than a ‘slump’ and I was dragging the people closest to me down towards my hell-hole.
It was recommended to me that I should try Yoga. So at the supermarket in Hastings south-east of Melbourne I had the good fortune of randomly choosing a DVD by this man Nirvair Singh Khalsa from his video series calledKundalini Yoga For Beginners. Soon after I procured the whole set and never looked back. I have tried many other Kundalini yoga videos since then, but I found they didn’t hold a candle up to the ingenious teachings of Nirvair Singh Khalsa. This wonderful video series has since been made available on you tube:
I see this magnum opus of yoga teaching as more a gift of wisdom than I do purely a series of exercises. It has had an immense impact on not only my physical health, but my emotional and spiritual well being. I haven’t met Nirvair in person, but I feel like I almost know him because he has been teleported to my lounge room on average 3 times a week for 15 years. I cannot recommend more highly Nirvair Singh Khalsa’s videos.
I should add that I am in no way affiliated with Nirvair’s ventures except to say I hope more people get hooked onto the enjoyable and relaxing benefits of yoga to find that sense of calm and peace within.
To quote Nirvair:
‘Students of this yoga, enjoy a deep sense of relaxation they get over a period of time. They learn to relax quickly. The other main compliment from students is how their backs feel better. Students gain heightened body awareness. How you sit, how you walk, your posture, the chair you sit in – all these things contribute to what shape your back is in. The glandular system will be well affected. You’ll find your digestion is better. You’ll find you have a more youthful appearance and gain a deep sense of calm over a period of time. You’ll gain flexibility, strength and immune system health.’
You’ve got it here first folks. Observation Blogger see’s a Brazil – Spain final and Brazil win. I picked the last World Cup final and winner – Spain.
My Colombian novia likes Brazil – France final and Brazil to win also.
Over to you. Send us a reply with your prediction below.
PS. If you choose the right team you will be awarded a special mention in an ‘Observation Blogger’ post and a self congratulatory pat on the back. Doesn’t get much better.
Australia was leading 3-0 against Ecuador in the first half. I thought I was dreaming. Their passing and control was world class. But early into the second half it became apparent that the first half was just a cruel dream wrapped inside a nightmare perhaps in preparation for the Group of Death in Brazil. Read more ›
I got hooked, lined and sinkered into the the whole conspiracy theory camp after seeing Oliver Stone’s JFK the movie. It aligned with my world view and the whole ‘masters of war’ rhetoric.
Thankfully, I did a bit of my own research and found that this movie was actually as biased and misleading as it accused others of being like the US Government.
I’m not insinuating there wasn’t some form of cover up, but what I am purporting is that JFK the movie has done more harm in hindering people from understanding what really happened than the suppression of information has by the US Government. A movie leaves a powerful imprint on the minds of viewers yet a lot of what is detailed in that movie are clearly great miss-truths. I feel quite embarrassed that I let myself fall for Stone’s conspiracy bullshit for so long.
Probably the best documentary I found which explains just how far fetched Stone’s version of the events is ‘Peter Jennings Reporting: The Kennedy Assassination – Beyond Conspiracy‘. It was originally broadcast in the UK on 23 November, 2003 on the BBC. The full video can be viewed at the end of this article.
I found the documentary so informative I felt compelled to write excerpts in an attempt to internalize the information. Most of what is written below is verbatim, however some of it is partially redacted to be more reader-friendly.
The Single Bullet theory
For most Americans, the idea of a lone assassin could kill the president, a man so widely revered – was simply too much to bear. For such a monstrous act, there must be a monstrous plot. It had to be a conspiracy. Yet the Single Bullet theory of the second shot which hits both men in a perfect trajectory from the book depository (as clearly seen on the zapruda film – frame 223) is not a theory at all. It is a fact. The fanciful Magic Bullet theory alluding to more than one gunman, hence a conspiracy is simply misleading and in a word – wrong. The bullet did not hang in air or zig zag. It went straight through. Both Kennedy and Connelly reacted at exactly the same time. In the Stone film it has Connelly sitting directly in front of the President rather than where he actually was 6 inches in board and turned sharply to his right after hearing the first shot. The Governor was also seated 3 inches lower than the President. When the men are seen in their correct positions it becomes clear. No magic about this bullet. The bullet found in a stretcher wasn’t in pristine condition as the Stone film states, but it was flat. It is also conclusively the same bullet fired from the LHO’s rifle and not planted by Jack Ruby as shown in the Stone film.
Lee Harvey Oswald
Over the last 50 years it’s as though the American people have lost almost all idea of who Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) was; his history, background and motives. His brother who knew him best, stated that if he had the facts that LHO was innocent he would be ‘out there’ shouting for his innocence. It’s his conviction that no one but Lee was involved. He further states, ‘People need to look at what transpired before that, everything. You have go all the way from childhood and all the way up, especially that last year of his life to understand what transpired in his life.’
It is uncanny the amount of people that knew Lee who say that he fantasized about who he was, and that nobody was paying attention that he was important. He spent the latter half of his life trying to be a revolutionary and make his mark on the world. In April 1963 he was ready to be a political assassin by killing Edwin Walker. He photographed Walker’s home and had a an escape route. He even left his wife instructions about what to do in case he didn’t return. This was the Rosetta Stone of the Kennedy assassination. Oswald had previously reached the grade of sharp shooter in the marines. He was able to fire rapidly and accurately at a target 200 yards away.
After he was rejected by the Cuban and Russian embassies in Mexico he had no place to turn. He definitely wasn’t changing the world as he had envisaged. Then the opportunity came. He ventured to the book depository building, his workplace with a long object wrapped in brown paper telling another worker, ‘it was curtain rods’. Later that day he would finally be somebody.
Jack Ruby
First words out of Jack Ruby’s mouth to a friend were, ‘I am a hero’. Like LHO he wanted to be important. Gangsters didn’t want anything to do with Jack. His temper was his trademark. Because Jack dined Police at his establishment, he could come and go at Police headquarters. Just hours after the JFK assassination, Jack closed his club. He was hysterical. He said he would shoot the son of a bitch if he gets a chance. If Jack Ruby knew something, he would let the whole world know. Over the weekend he was visibly upset, mumbling, not making sense. In his distorted mind, he did the right thing – This man killed his president. In less than 48 hours the president had been murdered and his assassin silenced. The floodgate on conspiracy were wide open.The people that knew Ruby didn’t think he was part of a conspiracy, but millions of Americans did.
Jim Garrison and the JFK The Movie
No book or TV program has done more to promote conspiracy theory than the JFK movie.
‘The most powerful historians of the 20th Century are filmmakers. It is those images that we remember…Most Americans know of the Kennedy Assassination through Oliver Stone’s mind…’. Robert Goldberg, Enemies Within
The film makes a hero out of Jim Garrison. Yet it is purported by many who knew him that he was unethical and cruel and obsessed with proving a conspiracy regardless of the evidence. When a public official like Garrison says something, people assume he knows what he is talking about. Garrison promoted himself as brave enough as facing a Government bent on burying the facts on what really happened. He said he was discovering a web of conspiracy, but in the end he put just one man on trial. But Garrison never explained why Shaw would want to kill the President. Garrison tried to put Shaw in the same apartment with LHO and David Ferrie, but the only witness Perry Russo stated at the lie detector test to Ed O’donnell, ‘I don’t know’ and later stated Shaw wasn’t there which incensed Garrison who was riding on his testimony and went into a rage. It took just 54 minutes for the jury to decide that Shaw was innocent.
As Shaw’s defense attorney stated, ‘It is possible that Jim Garrison’s charge was one of the greatest injustices of the legal system of the US’. Yet Oliver Stone’s film resurrected him as a hero. In reality the film is a package of unfathomable lies. A blending of real and fictional video emerged together which made audiences unable to tell the difference. But the film dispute s many facts. It purports THE GUY couldn’t do the shooting. NOBODY COULD.
FACT. The time of the fatal shot, LHO was just 88 yards away. For a former marine sharp shooter the shot was well within his capability. He was a highly competent marksman. He scored 48 out of 50 (or better) at 200 yards on multiple days. The Stone film states there being 6 seconds to get the shots off. But as per the Zapruda film 3 shots were fired in 8.3 seconds which for Oswald was plenty of time.
‘Back and to the left’, ‘Back and to the left’ is another Stone argument that there was another gunman, but this in no way indicates where a bullet came from. The entry wound is definitive of which direction the bullet came from and in this case it came from the back. The autopsy photos and xrays show the cratered wound on the back on Kennedy’s skull.
Most people believed everything in the movie and that is sad. It has put certain myths into the American bloodstream that abide to this day.
At the end of the day you just have to say, despite how much you want a conspiracy, there just is NO evidence. People want to believe that things are just not that random and things are just not that chaotic. Something larger and bigger was at stake here. How could someone as inconsequential as Oswald kill someone like the President?
I saw it The Lego Movie my son yesterday. I cannot understand 96% on Rotten Tomatoes. The beginning and end was interesting, but everything in between was well…very lego-ish. I felt like I was sitting in a boardroom watching a long lego promo. I was interested in seeing a movie, a film, a story. I wasn’t interested having products and the Lego brand shoved down my throat.
To quote an astute IMD member, ‘This film tries to manufacture emotional depth without actually having any – kind of an example of the main problem, which is that just by wishing they made a movie with real meaning it could be so. Toy Story and so many other great animated movies actually HAVE emotional depth and real feeling, and the contrast highlights that this facsimile is using pure manipulation. And kids know the difference‘ – my son also left shaking his head at the end and wondering what had gone wrong and why it wasn’t like ‘Frozen‘.
Great advertisement for Lego. That’s what I got from it, more than any other message. It hits on the nostalgia factor or the independent master builder message – but what is its end purpose? It’s just clever marketing. It isn’t in the same ballpark as the classic Toy Story 3.