Loveless (Russia) 2017 – Andrey Zvyagintsev (Friday’s Finest)

Loveless_(film)

Loveless (Nelyubov) is a 2017 Russian film nominated for best Foreign Language Film at the 2018 Oscars. It lost to the Chilean transgender drama A Fantastic Woman. Although I liked the latter, I thought Loveless was deserving of more ‘love’.
It paints a very stark and morbid picture of Russian secular society within the context of a family tragedy. There is no other movie which comes to my mind which portrays more audaciously the harsh reality of the breakdown of family. It really is a scathing indictment of modern parenting.

IMDB Storyline: Still living under the same roof, the Moscow couple of Boris and Zhenya is in the terrible final stages of a bitter divorce. Under those circumstances, as both have already found new partners, the insults pour down like rain in this toxic familial battle zone, always pivoting around the irresolvable and urgent matter of Alyosha’s custody, their 12-year-old only son. Unheard, unloved, and above all, unwanted, the introverted and unhappy boy feels that he is an intolerable burden, however, what his parents don’t know is that he can hear every single word. As a result, when Boris and Zhenya finally realize that Alyosha has been missing for nearly two days, it is already too late. But is this a simple case of a runaway teenager?

This film is difficult to watch because of the despicable characters that populate it. These poor-wretched souls take their misery out on each other over and over. On countless occasions, the characters check the screen of their smartphone. When nobody exchanges a smile or a kind word, digital friendships are better than nothing. They may have once been contented folk and life could return to some semblance of normalcy one day, but we are given no signs of it. Loveless also hints that the society in which they inhabit isn’t exactly blameless in all this, because it is claustrophobic in its nihilism. The bitter emptiness, disconnect and sorrow in this society could be anywhere. Not only in Russia.

My description might make this film sound like a chore to sit through, but it’s a wonderful movie. Loveless carries an absolutely powerful direction and a hauntingly beautiful cinematography. It’s definitely a movie which I doubt you’ll ever forget seeing. It’s fascinating in a morbid kind of way. People who are exhilarated by good film making can leave even a bleak movie on a high if it’s done well, and this is one of those films.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Movies and TV

Ask the Mountains (1995) – Vangelis

Vangelis

Ask the Mountains is a single by the Greek electronic composer Vangelis from the 1995 record Voices. According to Last FM.com – Evangelos Odysseas Papathanassiou (born 29 March 1943 in Volos,Greece), known professionally as Vangelis, is a Greek composer of electronic, progressive, ambient, jazz, and orchestral music. He is best known for his Academy Award-winning score for the film Chariots of Fire, composing scores for the films such as Blade Runner and the use of his music in the PBS documentary Cosmos: A Personal Voyage by Carl Sagan.

Paraphrased from Wikipedia – Ask the Mountains was sung by Stina Nordenstam and reached No 77 in the UK singles chart, but peaked higher in other European countries namely Austria (No 6) and Germany (24). The music was used in the soundtrack for the 1998 documentary Deep Sea, Deep Secrets which was coproduced by the Discovery channel.

Ask the Mountains is relaxing ambient (world) music; a genre I rarely listen to these days. I have no idea how it ended up in my library, but I like listening to it on the odd occasion.

Ask the mountains
Springs and fountains
Why couldn’t this go on?
Couldn’t our happiness go on?
Ask the sun that lightens up the sky
When the night gives in, to tell you why

Ask the mountains
Wild woods, highlands
Ask the green in the woods and the trees
The cold breeze coming in from the sea

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Music

Bobby Fischer – My 60 Memorable Games (First Printing 1969)

Bobby Fischer
In game 1 he writes that “Sherwin slid the Rook here with his pinky, as if to emphasize the cunning of this mysterious move.”

During one of my chess phases I bought the above book off ebay. It cost me a small fortune since it was a first printing. I have collected other written material about Fischer including the original Life magazine about his historic world championship win. I have been intrigued with chess and its history since I was a young kid. I remember my Dad taking my brother and I to local evening chess classes. I played for my school when I was an adolescent. Although I was never a gifted player I liked the brain exercise and mate-ship which came from playing it during school recess hours and tournaments around the State. I always got a kick out of hanging out with kids way smarter than me.

More than any other chess player I found Bobby Fisher the most compelling, not only because he revolutionized the game and won the USA it’s only world chess championship during the height of the cold war, but because his personal life and psychological state were so perplexing. Published in 1969, Fischer was initially reluctant to release My 60 Most Memorable Games. He had asked to be released from his contract since he did not want to reveal all his secrets, because the book has lengthy annotations and analysis of different possible variations of his games. According to wikipedia – In 1968 he changed his mind and decided to go ahead with publication. His friend and colleague Grandmaster Larry Evans, who helped in an editorial capacity and also wrote introductions to all the games, has said this was because Fischer felt philosophically that “the world was coming to an end anyway” (he thought that the Rapture was coming soon) and he might as well make some money.

One of my favourite documentaries which I frequently revisit is The World Against Bobby Fischer. The entire documentary is available below on You Tube. It does a very admirable job of unpacking the psychological state of one of the world’s greatest chess players. Stephen Tisdale’s reaction to the documentary was poignant:
His youth and upbringing were marred by a lack of love, direction, and identity. Combine these with genius and a extraordinary proficiency at applying that genius to chess and you have a recipe for pain, rejection, foolishness, and antagonism. Never underestimate the power of a good mother and father.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Reading, Reflections, Sport and Adventure

Archie, Marry Me (2014) – Alvvays

alvvays


This 2014 single is some sweet indiepop. Archie, Marry Me is from Canadian group Alvvays. It was their second song on their marvelous self-titled debut album.  It’s a great sweetener too to the type of music you can expect on the rest of their album. So if this song doesn’t tickle your fancy then I’m afraid Allvays may not be your thang.

It was included at No 98 in the Rolling Stones 100 greatest songs of this century (So far). They wrote: “It is a fictitious character, but the situation was a bit of an autobiographical one,” said singer Molly Rankin of Toronto’s Alvvays. True or not, the dreamy Canadian band delivered a sharp, skeptical view of modern romance, tangled up in some of the sweetest indie pop this side of Belle and Sebastian. The result was among the most charming guitar pop of this or any era.

I find Alvvays music just really puts me into a really pleasant mood. It takes me back to when I was about their age and just enjoying the carefree spirit of youth. They are a talented bunch too, just take a look at this live performance on KEXP. They also conduct themselves unabashedly normal for a successful pop group which is refreshing. I hope you do like Alvvays because the music project will feature plenty more from them.

Additional Reading:
1. Music representing the dissonance of loss: Molly Rankin and ‘Archie, Marry Me’ – mialondonblog

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Music

15/10 – 21/10/19 Springsteen, Madness of the Crowds and Poltergeist

news on the march

Welcome to Monday’s News on the March – The week that was in my digital world.

Article by Richard Williams at Thebluemoment:

“This is my 19th album,” Bruce Springsteen says towards the beginning of the film Western Stars, “and I’m still writing songs about cars.” But then he excuses himself by explaining how cars can become a metaphor for all kinds of things, including travelling without getting anywhere.

Western Stars is a performance film, but much more than that. Recorded over two days in front of a small audience in the hayloft of the 19th century wooden barn on his property in New Jersey, it features the 13 songs from the recent album of the same name.… (read more).

Article by Intellectualshaman:

As we walked away from the party, I realized everyone was getting high except Joy. She was sober, shockingly sober. She was watching everyone, like a feral cat, searching for an incoherent mouse. I felt these thoughts like electricity at the back of my brain and the hairs on my neck stood up, tingling with high voltage.

What do you think of that girl?” I asked. …Read more

Audio podcast at Sam Harris:

In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Andrew McAfee about the history of human progress and the modern uncoupling of our prosperity from resource consumption. They discuss the pitfalls and hidden virtues of capitalism, technological progress, environmental policy, the future of the developing world, and other topics. (Listen to full podcast).

Video Podcast by Bret Weinstein:

Douglas Murray, best selling author of 5 books including “The Strange Death of Europe” and “The Madness of Crowds” joins Bret Weinstein on the DarkHorse podcast to discuss wide range of controversial topics.

This is one of the most thought-provoking podcasts I have seen in a while. Of all the conversations Douglas has had about his newest book “The Madness of Crowds” this one is easily the best. Bret is an extremely engaging interviewer.…. (Watch full videopodcast)

Article by Reely Bernie:

I am only 7 years old, running aimlessly around the neighborhood cul de sac like any 7-year-old would do.

“Poltergeist is playing, Poltergeist is playing!” yells Deedoo, my next door neighbor who’s one year younger than me. 

I have no idea what “Poltergeist” is. Is it a tv show maybe having something to do with Star Wars because Deedoo knows that’s my thing? Is it a cartoon? (Read more)

news on the march the end

Posted in Movies and TV, News, politics

Aragonaise (1875) – Carmen Suite No 1 – Georges Bizet

The Carmen Suites are two suites of orchestral music drawn from the music of Georges Bizet’s 1875 opera Carmen and compiled posthumously by his friend Ernest Guiraud. They adhere very closely to Bizet’s orchestration.

Today in the music library project we look at The Aragonaise (literally a person or thing from Aragon, a region in Spain) is a “dance of Aragon” which appears as the Interlude (entr’acte) before the Opera’s fourth act.

This is a delightful piece; a highly animated and whimsical Spanish dance number. It certainly got me into a good headspace this morning when I played it loud. James Reel at All-music.com described The Aragonaise as ‘full of colorful woodwind writing over sharply accented, percussion-splashed rhythms‘.

A failure at its premiere, Bizet’s Carmen began to find its enormous success only a few months later- and sadly a few months after its composer’s death. More music will feature from the Carmen Suites where we will explore further Carmen – the Opera as well as composer Georges Bizet.

The information above was extrapolated from two sources: namely Wikipedia – Carmen Suites (Bizet/Guiraud) and All-music.com – Carmen Suite for orchestra No. 1 (assembled by Ernest Guirard)

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Music

Ordet (1955) – Carl Theodor Dreyer (Friday’s Finest)

Ordetposter
Theatrical Release Poster

Ordet meaning ‘The Word‘ is a 1955 Danish drama film based on a play by Kaj Munk, (a Danish Lutheran priest), first performed in 1932. The film won the Golden Lion at the 16th Venice International Film Festival. This film about Faith will not come to you, you have to go to it. The experience of the film demands a certain struggle, regardless of one’s beliefs, and the fact is like ‘faith’ itself it can’t be easily processed or rationalized. The film according to wikipedia is ‘now regarded by many critics as a masterpiece, admired particularly for its cinematography‘.

IMDB Storyline: How do we understand faith and prayer, and what of miracles? August 1925 on a Danish farm. Widowed Patriarch Borgen, who’s rather prominent in his community, has three sons: Mikkel, a good-hearted agnostic whose wife Inger is pregnant, Johannes, who believes he is Jesus, and Anders, young, slight, in love with the tailor’s daughter. The fundamentalist sect of the girl’s father is anathema to Borgen’s traditional Lutheranism; he opposes the marriage until the tailor forbids it, then Borgen’s pride demands that it happen. Unexpectedly, Inger, who is the family’s sweetness and light, has problems with her pregnancy. The rational doctor arrives, and a long night brings sharp focus to at least four views of faith.

The standout scenes in the movie involve Johannes, who believes he is Jesus. In the theatrical poster above you can see Johannes preaching as if he were giving a sermon on the mount. It is a beautifully shot scene and I couldn’t help but feel there’s something far more complex going on in this film and much of that is because of the way it’s constructed visually.  The other scene which I found powerful (and there are many of them) is when Johannes in his seemingly impaired state declares the following to the local Pastor who has has visited the Borgen household to greet them for the first time:

Ordet scene

Johannes Borgen: My name is Jesus of Nazareth.
Jesus…

Pastor: How can you prove that?

Johannes: Thou man of faith,
who himself lacks faith.
People believe in the dead Christ,
but not in the living.
They believe in miracles of
two thousand years ago.
But they do not believe in me now.
I am come again to witness for my Father in heaven and to work miracles.

Pastor: Miracles no longer happen.

Johannes: Thus speaks my church on earth. The church that has betrayed me,
murdered me in my own name. Here I stand, and again you cast me out. But if you nail me to the cross a second time, woe unto you.

Pastor: This is quite dreadful.

The ending of Ordet is one of the most impactful in cinema history and one which I will not discuss here since many will not have seen the film. But I will say the ending has been a paradoxical point of contention that has stimulated audiences, critics, and thinkers ever since Ordet was released in 1955. I was deeply troubled and moved and elated and frightened at the same time. Ordet is definitely one movie worth struggling with because in its own way it is a miraculous product.

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Movies and TV

Piano Concerto 2 in C Minor Op 18 – Sergei Rachmaninoff

Rachmaninoff_1900
Rachmaninoff in the early 1900s

I am excited to present to you the first piece from Sergei Rachmaninoff to appear in the music library project. Piano Concerto 2 in C Minor Op 18 premiered on November 9, 1901 and is one of his most enduring and popular pieces.  It is said this piece established his fame as a concerto composer and saved his career. Its premiere was given to great acclaim in Moscow with the composer himself as piano soloist. I was a relative latecomer to appreciating Rachmaninoff, but I now listen to his music all the time. He and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart remain my favourite classical composers. I first heard of Rachmaninoff and his music when academy award winner Geoffrey Rush wowed audiences playing David Helfgott in the Australian movie – Shine.

According to the Britannica.com web site: This piano concerto contains themes that, throughout the 20th century, which would be reborn as the melodies of several popular songs, including Frank Sinatra’s 1945 “Full Moon and Empty Arms” and Eric Carmen’s 1975 “All by Myself.” It was made most famous when set as the haunting motif of David Lean’s 1945 film Brief Encounter.

To get some sense why this Piano Concerto is so highly regarded one need only look at how it reshaped Rachmaninoff’s life. After the premiere of Rachmaninoff’s first symphony in 1897 he went into a deep depression. Although that symphony is now considered a significant achievement, the contemporary critics derided the Symphony. As wikipedia states: His second piano concerto confirmed his recovery from clinical depression and writer’s block, cured by courses of hypnotherapy and psychotherapy and helped by support from his family and friends. The concerto was dedicated to Nikolai Dahl, the physician who had done much to restore Rachmaninoff’s self-confidence.

The movie Shine seems to allude to what much of the following Britanica article has to say regarding Rachmaninoff’s music not being for the faint of heart at least for the pianist:
As a virtuoso pianist, Rachmaninoff composed for the instrument not only according to his own tastes but to his own strengths as well. He was, for example, a tall and lanky man with an astonishing reach to his hands. Pianists of small proportions need not apply, and even those of average size will find his work challenging. The great pianist Vladimir Ashkenazy observed in an interview with England’s Gramophone magazine that for playing Rachmaninoff, he wishes his fingers were a centimeter longer. Moreover, as Rachmaninoff could play both lightning-fast runs and powerful chords with equal mastery, he includes both in his piano parts, requiring a highly varied technique.

The above article also contains a very detailed and illuminating breakdown of the Concerto which is well worth reading.

Listen below to Rachmaninoff play his beloved Piano Concerto 2:

Tagged with: ,
Posted in Music

The Yellow Book – The Picture of Dorian Gray (Final)

The Yellow Book
The ‘yellow book‘ which corrupts Dorian Gray in Oscar Wilde’s novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray; is generally thought to be Joris-Karl Huysmans’s À rebours (1884).

Today on Wednesday’s book excerpt we revisit for the final occasion Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray. In our last encounter with Wilde’s only novel we explored Lord Henry’s enlightening views on humanity and science. The following dialogue between Henry and Dorian Gray occurs towards the end of the novel where the die has been well and truly cast on our protagonist Gray. Oscar Wilde paints such an alluring picture of youth in the first half of Dorian Gray that I like Dorian was being set up for the great fall due to my having succumbed to Henry’s morbid conclusions about ageing and windswept by his great monologue Youth is the One Thing Worth Having. You see, it’s the hedonistic and amoral Lord Henry who has corrupted the virtue and innocence that Dorian possessed at the start of the story. Henry appears on the surface unaware of the effect of his actions upon the young man, but even as Dorian remonstrates ‘I am going to be good’, Henry devilishly rebuttals ‘You cannot change to me, Dorian’ leaving Dorian behest to this unholy pact.

The book which Dorian accuses Henry of poisoning him with below is a thinly veiled reference to J.K. Huysmans’ À Rebours (“Against Nature”). The protagonist of that book is a representation of what Dorian could become—a robotic being with no true emotions and no true relationships—looking for only the next new sensation.

214 Dorian 1
214 Dorian 2
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Reading

Anthem (1992) – Leonard Cohen

Leonard Cohen 1992

Leonard Cohen 1992

This is the 4th song from Leonard Cohen in this music library project – that’s surprising considering we have only just past the halfway point of ‘A’s in the alphabetical order listing. Anthem from his 1992 album The Future is one of his most cherished and well-regarded songs. I’m even tempted to just simply call it a ‘poem’, because these words would leap right off the page and leave their indelible mark whether he sung them or not. Also Cohen offers a highly articulate and illuminating interpretation of its meaning at the end of this post.

Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack in everything
That’s how the light gets in

You can add up the parts
But you won’t have the sum
You can strike up the march
There is no drum
Every heart, every heart
To love will come
But like a refugee

Leonard Cohen’s literary work is as essential as his music. By the time he released his 1967 debut album, Songs of Leonard Cohen, he had already published four poetry collections and two novels.

As a student at McGill University, Cohen’s ability for poetry was noticed and nourished by his professors, Canadian poets Irving Layton and Louis Dudek, who helped steer the young poet from youthful depictions of trysts towards more mature imagery. “I told him that his sex life was no longer a secret,” the latter recalled in a 1970 interview with the Winnepeg Free Press. Cohen, he recalled, went away “giggling,” but the next day returned with the head-turning poem, “Sparrows.” His precocious talent was unmistakable:

But what shall I tell you of migrations
when in this empty sky
the precise ghosts of departed summer birds
still trace old signs

The poem was later awarded a literary prize by McGill, who also funded Cohen’s first collection, 1957’s Let Us Compare Mythologies.

Wikipedia article regarding Leonard Cohen’s 1992 album The Future in which Anthem was released:

The album charted as high as No. 36 in the U.K. and was phenomenally successful in Canada, going gold, platinum, and double-platinum. Cohen also won the Canadian Juno Award for Best Male Vocalist in 1993 for The Future. In his acceptance speech, he quipped, “Only in Canada could somebody with a voice like mine win Vocalist of the Year.”……..In the original Rolling Stone review, Christian Wright called the album “epic”, enthusing “The Future might as easily have been a book: A more troubling, more vexing image of human failure has not been written.”

Leonard Cohen once explained the meaning of Anthem as follows:

That is the background of the whole record, I mean if you have to come up with a philosophical ground, that is “Ring the bells that still can ring.” It’s no excuse… the dismal situation.. and the future is no excuse for an abdication of your own personal responsibilities towards yourself and your job and your love. “Ring the bells that still can ring”: they’re few and far between but you can find them. “Forget your perfect offering”, that is the hang-up, that you’re gonna work this thing out. Because we confuse this idea and we’ve forgotten the central myth of our culture which is the expulsion from the garden of Eden. This situation does not admit of solution or perfection. This is not the place where you make things perfect, neither in your marriage, nor in your work, nor anything, nor your love of God, nor your love of family or country. The thing is imperfect. And worse, there is a crack in everything that you can put together, physical objects, mental objects, constructions of any kind. But that’s where the light gets in, and that’s where the resurrection is and that’s where the return, that’s where the repentance is. It is with the confrontation, with the brokenness of things.
– from Diamonds in the Line

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in Music

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 783 other subscribers

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨